FIND BEST INFO ON THE CHURCHILL FALLS MOU RIGHT HERE

Editor’s Note: The Churchill Falls MOU is the most important agreement negotiated since Newfoundland and Labrador joined Canada in 1949.

Everyone needs to be informed on what it contains.

So far, analysis suggests that the MOU is worse than the 1969 Churchill Falls Contract.

Perform your own analysis, however; begin with the fine work performed by trusted analysts, most having written on the Uncle Gnarley Blog since it was established in 2012. This is too important to leave to partisan politicians or to the propaganda specialists at NL Hydro. – Des Sullivan

Two web sites have been created by others:

It’s Churchill All Over Again

The Uncle Gnarley Blog Posts and other sources starting with latest:

Provincial election? Bring it on, say Newfoundland critics of Quebec energy deal by Sarah Smellie Canadian Press (CBC story)

How the Pros and Cons of Complex Churchill Falls MOU Could Affect NL Vote by Gary Kean (The Telegram)

Critic says Quebec energy deal doesn’t serve N.L.(CBC News)

Why There Must Be a Referendum on Churchill Falls MOU‑2

We must not allow our politicians to rush us into another bad deal on Churchill Falls. That is precisely why a referendum is necessary. Think about it.

NL to Receive $1 Value Out of Every $100 for Churchill Falls Water

Dr. May estimates that, in 2027, the water is worth around $2.46 billion. However, under the new MOU (DCIA) between Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec, the Newfoundland and Labrador Treasury will receive roughly $28 million—only about $1 out of every hundred dollars. Remember this is not phantom money! This is resource revenue that represents support for public services such as schools, hospitals, and infrastructure.

In MOU2 Carney is Aiding NL’s Capitulation to Quebec’s Long‑Standing East‑West Energy Monopoly

What’s unfolding in the Quebec-NL MOU2 is not cooperation, not partnership, not “nation‑building,” and certainly not the energy vision that Prime Minister Mark Carney...