THE DIRTY NINETEEN

Guest Post written by “Agent 13”


We have all heard of “The Dirty Dozen”, the D-day British pre-invasion team, glorified in the 1967 film, of the same name.  The “Dirty Nineteen” are
nothing like them and have earned no glory.

Let me introduce them.

Back in June 14th 2012, the Provincial PC Government was in
the final stages of voting on Bill 29. The Bill amended the province’s access
to information legislation.  The changes
constituted a massive step backwards for democracy, having permitted a level of
governmental secrecy never before seen in Newfoundland and Labrador or Canada.

Much of the secrecy around the Muskrat Falls Project was afforded by these
amendments.


At the time the Bill was passed, comments like this one were ubiquitous:
“Bill 29 goes too far. Sadly the Government did not see fit to allow a
reasonable debate to unfold, instead using closure to push the legislation
through so fast that many access advocates across the country barely knew of
its existence”.  

The Government invoked Closure; a measure to cut off debate of the Bill in the
House of Assembly. It was was passed after three days of filibuster, by the
Opposition. 



31 members of the PC Government used their majority to pass Bill
29.

People, from journalism professors to press associations, condemned the
measures.

It took a massive public outcry to force an arrogant and unbowed
Administration to reconsider and to finally appoint a Commission, led by former
Chief Justice Clyde Wells, to propose changes, which are now law.

___________________________________________________
Also by “Agent 13”:
PREMIER DAVIS: NOW IS NOT THE “RIGHT TIME”
____________________________________________________


Some of the questions that will follow me into the Polling booth on
November 

are these: can we trust the same people who voted for
Bill 29?  Are they really the best people
we can send to the Legislature to ensure transparency in government operations,
in the expenditure of public money and, otherwise, to protect the public
interest?

As of today, the PC’s have 33 candidates running in the upcoming
provincial election.  By my count 17 of
them voted for Bill 29, in 2012. Two others are running for the Liberals.

Let’s make them accountable. Here they are:

 1.       Baie Verte – Green Bay – Candidate:  Kevin Pollard
 2.       Bonavista – Candidate: 
Glen Little
 3.       Cape St. Francis – Candidate: Kevin Parsons
 4.       Ferryland – Candidate: 
Keith Hutchings
 5.       Fogo Island – Cape Freels – Candidate: Eli Cross
 6.       Fortune Bay – Cape La Hune – Candidate: Tracey Perry
 7.       Harbour Grace – Port de Grave – Candidate: Glen Littlejohn
 8.       Labrador West – Candidate: Nick McGrath
 9.       Lake Melville – Candidate: Keith Russell
10.      Lewisporte – Twillingate
– Candidate: Derrick Daley
11.      Mount Pearl North –
Candidate: Steve Kent
12.      Placentia West – Bellevue
– Candidate: Calvin Peach
13.      St. George’s – Humber –
Candidate: 
14.      St. John’s West –
Candidate: Dan Crummell
15.      Stephenville – Port au
Port – Candidate: Tony Cornect
16.      Terra Nova – Candidate:
Sandy Collins
17.      Topsail – Paradise –
Candidate:  Paul Davis

And, running for the Liberals:

18.      St. John’s south – Tom
Osborne
19.      Mount Pearl South – Paul
Lane

So, if any of the “Dirty 19” makes their rounds in the media and on
your doorsteps looking for your vote, you might want to ask them what they were
doing on June 14, 2012. Ask them why they worked against you, not for you.

The “Dirty Dozen” are renowned for their bravery. But the “Dirty 19”, from
where I sit, are just cowards of Closure.
______________________________________________________________________

Editor’s Note: 
Most readers will know “Agent 13” as one of the good guys, a support for 
“Agent 86” (Max) on the 70s TV Series, “Get Smart”.  Our “Agent 
13″ is an active professional with a keen interest in public policy issues. 
Having adopted “Agent 13″ as his pseudonym, he has chosen only to reveal 
his humourous side. On public policy matters, as his “reports” confirm, he 
has a serious side, too. 

Churchill Falls Explainer (Coles Notes version)

If CFLCo is required to maximize its profit, then CFLCo should sell its electricity to the highest bidder(s) on the most advantageous terms available.

END OF THE UPPER CHURCHILL POWER CONTRACT: IMPROVING OUR BARGAINING POWER

This is the most important set of negotiations we have engaged in since the Atlantic Accord and Hibernia. Despite being a small jurisdiction we proved to be smart and nimble enough to negotiate good deals on both. They have stood the test of time and have resulted in billions of dollars in royalties and created an industry which represents over a quarter of our economy. Will we prove to be smart and nimble enough to do the same with the Upper Churchill?

AN ETHICAL WALL FOR AND A TÊTE-À-TÊTE WITH PREMIER FUREY

I've been wondering if the whole "ethical wall" business has prevented the Premier of our province from acting where he might and should act?

2 COMMENTS

  1. This is the excerpt from Hansard, the House of Assembly transnscript, which recorded the vote on Bill 29:

    All those in favour of the motion, please stand.

    CLERK: Mr. Kennedy, Ms Burke, Ms Sullivan, Mr. O’Brien, Mr. Jackman, Mr. French, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Hedderson, Mr. Felix Collins, Mr. Dalley, Mr. Verge, Mr. Kent, Mr. Granter, Ms Johnson, Mr. Hutchings, Mr. Davis, Mr. McGrath, Mr. Sandy Collins, Mr. Kevin Parsons, Mr. Little, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Osborne, Ms Perry, Mr. Dinn, Mr. Cornect, Mr. Littlejohn, Mr. Crummell, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Cross, Mr. Peach, Mr. Lane, Mr. Russell.

    MR. SPEAKER: All those against the motion, please stand.

    CLERK: Mr. Ball, Ms Jones, Mr. Andrew Parsons, Mr. Joyce, Mr. Edmunds, Mr. Bennett, Ms Michael, Mr. Kirby, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Mitchelmore, Ms Rogers.

    Mr. Speaker, the ayes: thirty-one; the nays: eleven.