NAPE and CUPE: Kill Muskrat or Run Radio Ads?

Public
sector unions need to shut down Muskrat Falls; they ought to have opposed the
Project from the very beginning.

Unions now
constitute the only organized group that possess the ability to put this
Project on hold before it hurts everyone. 
It is in their self-interest take such a decision.

Why?  Because, when governments correct for high
deficits, public servants are the first to be affected. The process starts with
attrition, then claims positions held by those transitioning. If that combined
figure is inadequate, Government determines how many additional bureaucrats
have to go, no matter how important they may be; then the pink slips go
out.  I watched it happen when I was
employed on the ‘Hill” and since.

Likely,
public servants feel those bad years are behind us; that it’s all downhill from
here.  That’s because a lot of people,
including the public sector unions are talking that way.  They have ignored the potential fall-out from
Muskrat Falls including the problem of cost overruns and the effect of
declining oil prices. They cannot imagine the harm one of those problems can cause or the
consequences of “the perfect storm”, where all three converge to impact
lives and careers.

Muskrat sanction
has imperiled not just the current round of labour negotiations, it threatens the
Treasury, the status of social programs and it has placed the pensions of
current and future retired public sector workers in jeopardy.

I can’t
imagine Muskrat Falls has not been a subject of intense discussion inside union
offices.  Are these organizations not
well funded?  Are they dedicated only to
collective bargaining and to settling grievances?  Do they not attempt to identify, before it is
too late, public policies that are too risk laden?  Isn’t the decision to try and kill a public
policy a better approach than another series of radio ads? Isn’t this the job of
leadership?

All major
groups attempt to influence public policies. 
The public sector unions can be credited with having ignored the most
dangerous public policy ever advanced in the history of this Province!

Should public
sector unions truly demand a halt to the Muskrat Falls Project, immediately?  Yes. 

They should insist
that no further expenditures are made before Nova Scotia’s UARB has ruled on
the Maritime Link (ML), Emera has confirmed construction of the ML and the ‘Independent
Engineer’ has determined that all of the ‘pre-conditions’, to the Federal Loan
Guarantee, have been met.  (Likely, you
are unfamiliar with those issues, in which case, some of my earlier articles
may help).  Yes, that is only the first
step. Then, they need to review the whole Project.

The St.
John’s Board of Trade urged sanction.  It
gave no quarter to warnings of either cost or risk.  Any nod to scrutiny and democratic practice
or even concern for social or fiscal policy impacts were never in evidence.  The Board, though, was very public about its
position while public servants, far more exposed, were silent.

It is rare
that business people and union leaders are on the same side of an issue,
especially when their self-interests frequently conflict.  Members of the Board of Trade, though, do not
depend on that organization, as do public servants, who rely on their unions to
negotiate job security and wage issues. 

Perhaps, NAPE
and CUPE did not want to be at odds with the Federation of Labour whose
articulate leader has been vocally supportive.

Perhaps,
they did not want to be offside with the Building Trades Council; though, why
that group (at the very least) did not insist that it follow Hebron, rather
than ‘piggy back’ that Project, is baffling.   

Perhaps, they
did not want to be contrary to the position of the Federal NDP or to the NDP
Government of Nova Scotia.

If they
bought the suggestion that Muskrat Falls is an ‘investment’, as the head of
NAPE noted on radio, last Tuesday morning, with CBC’s Debbie Cooper, I fear
they have been drinking the Premier’s wine. 

I don’t know
if any one answer is correct or if they all are.  However, I am confident there will be a big
price to be paid by everyone; public servants will pay a disproportionate
share.

Let’s have a
sober look at some facts.

Figures for
the period 2006-2010 show that the number of NL Government employees increased
by 2,396 or 26%.  Population growth, by
comparison for the same period, was inconsequential!  

Why does
this matter? Because, it makes public servants an even bigger target!

Are public
servants any less vulnerable following those ‘fat’ years?  I’m talking deficit, the deficit in the
pension fund and public debt.

Did the
Government get a handle on the public service pension deficit?  No.  It
is forecast to be $3.09 billion and it is growing fast.

Was the
public debt addressed during this period of high revenues?  Only modestly. 
The net debt is still
forecast at around $8.5 billion.

What about the deficit? In the current fiscal year, it tripled
to $725 million.  Next year’s numbers may
be worse.  

Is it against this background that public sector unions enter
wage negotiations?  Only partially! 

What about oil prices? They currently have a downward
trajectory.
 The Government should release any
recent oil forecasts.  I read a highly
credible forecast, recently, which projected $85 oil before Muskrat is completed!  That’s serious, isn’t it? It is a long way
from this year’s $127.00/barrel ‘budget plug’.

Like it or not, from the very beginning, Muskrat was a speculation.
 Lower oil prices will undermine Muskrat
Falls and starve the Treasury of royalties and taxes.

So, on what
basis did the public service unions feel they could give de facto support to that
Project?

I don’t
know.  But, it is the elephant (I prefer
albatross) in the room; it will divide the two sides at the bargaining
table.  It will be there this year, next
year and for many years to come.
 

The Government needs $ 2 billion equity for the Project.  Immediately, it has to fund Muskrat
contractors, from its cash, in the hope and anticipation that Emera and the Federal
Loan Guarantee will materialize.   In addition, it will need a billion dollars,
and possibly more, to fund its share of equity of offshore projects. 

The Government sent a reported $664 million to Nalcor this
year alone; but, bear in mind that, in 2006, Nalcor was told, by the Williams
Government, to keep the other revenues it receives, revenues that are normally
earmarked for program expenditures.  

The Government cannot
afford all these expenditures, run huge deficits and face the likelihood of big
cost overruns on the Muskrat Project, too. 
Not without slaying the livelihoods of an awful lot of people. It simply
can’t be done and most certainly not in a declining oil price environment!  

Should the public sector Unions have been monitoring these
activities and put their foot down on Muskrat Falls, last year?

I think so.
 

Let me be clear.  This
Blog is not about offering advice.  It is
about opinion. Mine. Anyone or no one need share it.  So, I will add this view.  Aside from all the admirable goals for which unionism
stands, it will contribute nothing to its charter if it claims its share of the
economic ‘prize’ even when it is a witting party to the  collapse of the ‘whole deck of cards’.  

Today, a contractor is digging a giant hole at Muskrat Falls
where the generating station will be located.  Soon, this Project will be beyond
stopping.  NAPE Radio ads will not cure
the fallout or sate the needs of its membership. 

Halting the Project will require a lot of leadership.  Union leaders will need to make a big
decision; little ones won’t do!

A final point.

Piled on top of the many reasons to kill Muskrat Falls, is Emera’s
tenuous commitment.  The Halifax Herald, noted
as recently as January 10, 2013 the comments of Emera’s CEO, Chris Huskilson, the
guy on whom Nalcor is counting to build the Maritime Link and secure the
Federal Loan Guarantee. The CEO stated his commitment this way:

“We have not signed anything that would obligate
Nova Scotia customers to take this energy. All we’ve done was sign something
that creates that opportunity.”

Is that the only irony? Alas, no!

The Minister who piloted the Muskrat file now sits across the
table from the public sector negotiators.

Do I hear ‘naysayer’?   

Did someone have the courage to reply, “Shut it down”?    
Des Sullivan
Des Sullivan
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada Uncle Gnarley is hosted by Des Sullivan, of St. John's. He is a businessman engaged over three decades in real estate management and development companies and in retail. He is currently a Director of Dorset Investments Limited and Donovan Holdings Limited. During his early career he served as Executive Assistant to Premier's Frank D. Moores (1975-1979) and Brian Peckford (1979-1985). He also served as a Part-Time Board Member on the Canada-Newfoundland Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (C-NLOPB). Uncle Gnarley appears on the masthead representing serious and unambiguous positions on NL politics and public policy. Uncle Gnarley is a fiscal conservative possessing distinctly liberal values and a non-partisan persusasion. Those values and opinions underlie this writer's views on NL's politics, economy and society. Uncle Gnarley publishes Monday mornings and more often when events warrant.

NALCOR (Masquerading as ‘Hydro’)LIVES IN AN UPSIDE DOWN WORLD

If a Big Mac costs McDonalds $10 to produce and it is sold for $1.50, McDonalds will go out of business. They would not declare a profit!

REMEMBERING BILL MARSHALL

Bill left public life shortly after the signing of the Atlantic Accord and became a member of the Court of Appeal until his retirement in 2003. During his time on the court he was involved in a number of successful appeals which overturned wrongful convictions, for which he was recognized by Innocence Canada. Bill had a special place in his heart for the underdog.

Churchill Falls Explainer (Coles Notes version)

If CFLCo is required to maximize its profit, then CFLCo should sell its electricity to the highest bidder(s) on the most advantageous terms available.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Yup! The cards are on the table. Will the hand that gets fed go for the bird in the hand or the two in the bush.
    Albatross! The irony being here that shooting (not accepting) this bird will give us much benefit later.
    Perhaps I read to much into a great article, lol!

  2. Those of us at the epicentre of this fiasco can only hope smarter heads will prevail. With all due respect to the people who will pay the bills, it don't look good. When this Island was a country it drew from the population who inhabited it, they lost it. It looks as if history is about to repeat, except this time nothing will be lost except the spector of, nothing big can ever suceed on this Island. The mainland will bail you out yet again, unless the total resource of Labrador can be mortaged to salvage its economy. This will be a deep scar on the first woman Premier. Make no mistake Muskrat Falls is going down sooner or later, it cannot compete in the open market. It was doomed the day the idea was conceived. My spelling aside.

  3. Lets not forget. The current financial mess is not the makings of Dunderdale. The seed was sown in 2006 when the Williams government proceeded on 5 years of unprecendented growth in public spending. Only a few people or organizations complained at the time, and NAPE were not one of them. Now we are in a real mess, which the foundation of which was based on Williams, Ed MArtin, and Marshall thinking that oil would trade forever at 150 $/barrel. They were wrong. We need serious cuts. This includes halting Muskrat Falls, and a 10-20% reduction in provincial spending. This may sound harsh…. but we need a reality check. The Williams/Dunderdale regime will be known as decade of squandered opportunity. A future missive for Uncle Gnarley maybe.